[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 2, Number 4 (Winter 2014) ::
Journal of Clinical Nursing and Midwifery 2014, __VOLUME_4_(_3_ISSUE__): 1-7 Back to browse issues page
Evaluating the quality of materials and methods for writings of final proposal in clinical trial studies in Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences based on Consort checklist
Mohammad Taghi Moradi, Majid Asadi-Samani, Mahmoud Mobasheri *
, mobasheri@skums.ac.ir
Abstract:   (6892 Views)
Background and aim: It is necessary to state total information about the design, procedures, intervention groups in study, results for data in order to present a suitable report of controlled randomized clinical trial. This study was aimed to evaluate the quality of materials and methods for the writings of final proposal in clinical trial studies in Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. Methods: In this descriptive –analytic study, 53 approved final proposals of controlled randomized clinical trial studies in Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences were selected from 1998 to 2013. The selection and quality of material and method writing was evaluated based on final version of consort checklist. Results: The scores mean was obtained for the quality of materials and methods writings based on the checklist 6.75±1.92. The notation of interventions in each group (%96.2), identification of primary and secondary study (%88.7), and the state of statistical ways (% 86.8) showed the most scores and the randomizing the least score (%3.8). The projects which were the student theses rather than not being thesis (p=0.011). Conclusion: Performed clinical trials in Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences aren’t in a suitable report way. So, it is advised to provide a standard consort instruction and was delivered to researchers, reviewers, and statistical counselors in order to design study and report clinical trial studies.
Keywords: Evaluation, Clinical trial, Final reports, Studies qualities
Full-Text [PDF 267 kb]   (1807 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Orginal Article | Subject: Special
Received: 2014/03/12 | Accepted: 2014/03/12 | Published: 2014/03/12
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or email:

Write the security code in the box >



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Moradi M T, Asadi-Samani M, Mobasheri M. Evaluating the quality of materials and methods for writings of final proposal in clinical trial studies in Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences based on Consort checklist. Journal of Clinical Nursing and Midwifery. 2014; 2 (4) :1-7
URL: http://jcnm.skums.ac.ir/article-1-79-en.html
Volume 2, Number 4 (Winter 2014) Back to browse issues page
مجله بالینی پرستاری و مامایی Journal of Clinical Nursing and Midwifery
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.048 seconds with 791 queries by yektaweb 3461